Statues
- IPC
- 365,
- 366 - Kidnapping
- 376 - Rape
- 376D - Gang Rape
- 506 - Criminal Intimidation
- Section 3 & 4 of POCSO Act
Important Points
- Subsequent marriage between the victim and accused will NOT be absolve of the rape charge.
- Rape is a serious offence and that no amount of compromise between the parties is sufficient to quash the FIR or waive off the punishment for rape u/s 376 CrPC.
- Criminal Law ( Amendment ) Act, 2018
- increased min punishment for rape under 376 of IPC to 10y [ Manoj Mishra Vs State of UP ] - prior it was min 7y
Points to consider for Reduction of punishment
- Age of the accused
- previous criminal antecedents
- Family - if any dependents children or elderly
- No apprehension that appellant would indulge in similar acts
Case Laws
- Munna Khan Vs State of UP
- Facts :
- Women alleges of rape and compelling her to change her religion ( UP Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Ordinance, 2020 )
- Order
- Bail granted to accused
- Reasons
- Applicant and complainant were in relationship from last 4y
- No Objection or resistance from side of the complainant
- All of a sudden, after coming this Ordinance into existence, she got aware about her rights.
- Her mental thinking exposes about her conduct.
- She was willful and active participant in all actions faced by her during 4y
Arguments For
- Obscene photographs and vides of victim and used them as tools of blackmail into maintaining physical relationship
Arguments Against
- Willful conduct, self admission
- Long continuous relationship
- No recovery of obscene still photographs or video said to have been used to blackmail victim.
Precautions
- Check if the victim is a child, ossification test
- if child 365 IPC applies
No comments:
Post a Comment