MP/ MLA Case
- Immunities and Privileges
- Protest by MLA protected by immunities and privileges under A194(3) of Constitution of India
- Privileges u/s A194 cannot be used to cover for violent actions of members in the precincts of LA
- Lokayukta Justice Ripusuan Dayal Vs State of MP 2014 4 SCC 473
- Privileges can only be provided to the extent required so as to allow the members to perform the function without hindrance.
- Privilege cannot be used as shield to circumvent the application of criminal law since NO person enjoys privilege against criminal Prosecution.
- Breach of Privilege - Breach of Privilege is a contempt of the House, which falls under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Speaker of the Assembly.
- There is NO PROVISION under Constitution or Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in persuant of A208(1) that mandate police to seek permission or sanction of speaker before registering a crime against a MLA.
- Public Interest : Freedom of MLA are necessary for the functioning of democracy and are subject to the power of Speaker or the criminal court with the sanction of the speaker
- Absence of Mens Rea :
- Lack of Evidence
- Such arguments regarding inadequacy of evidence for successful conviction must be raised accused while seeking discharge
- Sheonandan Paswan Vs State of Bihar (1987) 1 SCC 288
- Case Law
- P.V Narasimha Rao Vs State ( CBI/SPE) Etc AIR 1998 SC 2120
- Immunity can be claimed by MLA's ONLY in exercise of free speech and voting
No comments:
Post a Comment